Advantages of using prototype, vs defining methods straight in the constructor?

javascript, oop, prototype

Solution

Methods that inherit via the prototype chain can be changed universally for all instances, for example:

function Class () {}
Class.prototype.calc = function (a, b) {
    return a + b;
}

// Create 2 instances:
var ins1 = new Class(),
    ins2 = new Class();

// Test the calc method:
console.log(ins1.calc(1,1), ins2.calc(1,1));
// -> 2, 2

// Change the prototype method
Class.prototype.calc = function () {
    var args = Array.prototype.slice.apply(arguments),
        res = 0, c;

    while (c = args.shift())
        res += c;

    return res; 
}

// Test the calc method:
console.log(ins1.calc(1,1,1), ins2.calc(1,1,1));
// -> 3, 3

Notice how changing the method applied to both instances? This is because `ins1` and `ins2` share the same `calc()` function. In order to do this with public methods created during construction, you'd have to assign the new method to each instance that has been created, which is an awkward task. This is because `ins1` and `ins2` would have their own, individually created `calc()` functions.

Another side effect of creating methods inside the constructor is poorer performance. Each method has to be created every time the constructor function runs. Methods on the prototype chain are created once and then "inherited" by each instance. On the flip side of the coin, public methods have access to "private" variables, which isn't possible with inherited methods.

As for your `function Class() {}` vs `var Class = function () {}` question, the former is "hoisted" to the top of the current scope before execution. For the latter, the variable declaration is hoisted, but not the assignment. For example:

// Error, fn is called before the function is assigned!
fn();
var fn = function () { alert("test!"); } 

// Works as expected: the fn2 declaration is hoisted above the call
fn2();
function fn2() { alert("test!"); }

Problem

I am wondering if there are any advantages of using any of these over the other, and which way should I go? Constructor approach: ``` var Class = function () { this.calc = function (a, b) { return a + b; }; }; ``` Prototype approach: ``` var Class = function () {}; Class.prototype.calc = function (a, b) { return a + b; }; ``` I don't like that, using the prototype, method definitions are separated from the class, and I'm not aware if there is any specific reason I should use this over just the first approach. Also, is there any benefit of using a function literal to define a "class", over just function definition: ``` var Class = function () {}; ``` vs ``` function Class () {}; ``` Thanks!

Original source

Related problems