how does one compare the date part of a nullable datetime in a linq / lambda query?

c#, datetime, linq

Solution

A quick hack is:

a.AGG_DateEnd.GetValueOrDefault().Date >= SelectedFrom

This is OK because the `default(DateTime)` (which equals its own `.Date`) is not greater than any (other) `DateTime` value.

Otherwise the usual thing to do is:

a.AGG_DateEnd.HasValue && a.AGG_DateEnd.Value.Date >= SelectedFrom

where the double `&` ensures short-cut evaluation.

Addition after comments:

If you want the opposite answer in the case where it is `null`, it is:

(a.AGG_DateEnd ?? DateTime.MaxValue).Date >= SelectedFrom

respectively:

!a.AGG_DateEnd.HasValue || a.AGG_DateEnd.Value.Date >= SelectedFrom

Later edit: Since C# 6.0 (July 2015), you can use the `?.` operator instead. So use the shorter code:

a.AGG_DateEnd?.Date >= SelectedFrom

which will (formally, at least) compare two nullable values of type `DateTime?`. When either operand is "null" (i.e. `.HasValue` gives `false`), such a comparison gives `false`.

If you want the opposite bool result in case of null, that is:

!(a.AGG_DateEnd?.Date < SelectedFrom)

Observe how `x >= y` is different from `!(x < y)` when we use these lifted operators that operate on `Nullable<>` values. Any lifted operator (like `>=` or `<`) will return `false` immediately if one of `x` and `y` is null; only if both `x` and `y` are non-null, will they be unwrapped and the contents compared with the non-lifted operator whose return value will be used.

Problem

I have something like the following: ``` new ObservableCollection<SomeData>(SomeDataCollection.Where(a => a.AGD_Category.Equals((int)AGD_CategoryEnum.Med) && ((a.AGG_DateStart.Date <= SelectedUntill) && (a.AGG_DateEnd.Value.Date >= SelectedFrom)))); ``` now my a.AGG_DateEnd is a nullable datetime and whenever there is a null value in the list I get an exception because of the "a.AGG_DateEnd.Value.Date" part. But the thing is, the a.AGG_DateEnd also contains hours and minutes, but I do not want this causes my comparison to give unreliable results. What can I do to improve? Thank you,

Original source