Best practice to hang on to variables when using Promises
javascript, node.js, promise
Solution
Note: I'm using bluebird in this answer.
There are 3 ways to do what you want: closures, binding, and `Promise.using`.
Closure is the way @Sukima showed.
function promisedFunc() {
var db;
return getCollection().then(function(col) {
db = col;
return db.query(stuff);
}).then(function() {
return db.query(otherStuff);
});
}
Binding: using `Promise.bind`, you can make `this` an object that will hold values.
function promisedFunc() {
return getCollection().bind({}).then(function(col) {
this.db = col;
return this.db.query(stuff);
}).then(function() {
return this.db.query(otherStuff);
});
}
Finally, the last way, introduced by bluebird v2, is using real resource management.
function promisedFunc() {
return Promise.using(getDb(), function(db) {
return db.query(stuff).then(function() {
return db.query(otherStuff);
});
});
}
I'm going to explain the `getDb` method further down.
The last way provides another very interesting benefit: disposing resources. For example, you often have to call a `close` method for database resources. `Promise.using` lets you create disposers, running once the promises in it are resolved (or not).
To see why this is an advantage, let's review the 3 ways to do this.
Closure:
var db, close;
return getCollection().spread(function(col, done) {
db = col;
close = done;
return db.query(stuff);
}).then(function() {
return db.query(otherStuff);
}).finally(function() {
close();
});
And yes, it means you have to write all this boilerplate every time you use the db connection. No other choice.
Now let's see the binding way:
return getCollection().bind({}).spread(function(col, done) {
this.db = col;
this.close = done;
return this.db.query(stuff);
}).then(function() {
return this.db.query(otherStuff);
}).finally(function() {
this.close();
});
Now however, this can be modularized.
var db = {
getDb: function() { return getCollection().bind({}); },
close: function() { this.close(); }
};
return db.getDb().then(function() {
return this.db.query(stuff);
}).then(function() {
return this.db.query(otherStuff);
}).finally(db.close);
This is already a lot nicer! But we still have to think about using `finally`.
And then, the way introduced by bluebird, `Promise.using`. By declaring it this way:
function getDb() {
var close;
return getCollection().spread(function(db, done) {
close = done;
return db;
}).disposer(function() {
close();
});
}
You can simply use it as seen before:
return Promise.using(getDb(), function(db) {
return db.query(stuff).then(function() {
return db.query(otherStuff);
});
});
No need to think about `finally`, and no boilerplate.
Problem
I am new to Promises and I was wondering what the best practice is to keep variables while going down the chain? Connecting to MongoDB via Promise is pretty straight forward: ``` connectToMongoDB(data).done(function(db) { var collection = db.collection('test_inserts'); // do more stuff here }); ``` But what happens if I have to connect to two different databases? ``` connectToMongoDB1(data1).then(function(db1) { return connectToMongoDB2(data2); }).done(function(db2) { var collection = db1.collection('test_inserts'); // ERROR: db1 is undefined }); ``` That error makes perfect sense. But how do I forward `db1` without altering my `connectToMongoDB2()` function, because I want to keep `connectToMongoDB2()` and all my promises in general very generic? I mean, I could wrap an object around that stores all the relevant stuff, but that looks kind of hacky: ``` var relevantStuff = {}; connectToMongoDB1(data1).then(function(db1) { relevantStuff.db1 = db1; return connectToMongoDB2(data2); }).done(function(db2) { var collection = relevantStuff.db1.collection('test_inserts'); // do more stuff here }); ``` What is the best practice?