Implements neper number (e) with a recursion function

algorithm, c++, recursion

Solution

Still not sure what you want `res` for. In fact, if I got creative with the sign of `n` this doesn't need `i` either.

double f(int i, int n)
{
    return (i == 0) ? ((n <= 1) ? 1 : n * f(0,n-1))
        : ((n < 1) ? 1 : 1/f(0, n) + f(i,n-1));
}

int main()
{
    for (int n=1; n<16; ++n)
        std::cout << std::setprecision(16) << f(1,n) << std::endl;
    return 0;
}

Output

2
2.5
2.666666666666667
2.708333333333333
2.716666666666666
2.718055555555555
2.718253968253968
2.71827876984127
2.718281525573192
2.718281801146385
2.718281826198493
2.718281828286169
2.718281828446759
2.71828182845823
2.718281828458995

This was what I meant about toying with the sign for `n` to eliminate i as well:

double f(int n)
{
    return (n < 0) ? ((n == -1) ? 1 : -n * f(n+1))
        : ((n < 1) ? 1 : 1/f(-n) + f(n-1));
}

The results are the same. In both cases the function is defined to dual-purpose it recursive algorithm. When asked to, it computes 1/n!, otherwise it computes the running sum + the next number down (which is 1/(n-1)!, etc...)

Problem

I want to calculate Neper number(e) with a recursion function. I have the formula to calculate it: e = (1/0!) + (1/1!) + (1/2!) + (1/3!) +. . . I have the code but it won't work properly: ``` #include <iostream> using namespace std; double f(double res,int i, int n){ return (i == n) ? res: res = res + (1 /f(res,i+1,n)*i); } int main(){ cout << f(1,1,2) << endl; } ``` The result of this code is `2.5` but it should be `2`. Where is the problem?

Original source