Should one use < or <= in a for loop
conventions, performance, readability
Solution
The first is more idiomatic. In particular, it indicates (in a 0-based sense) the number of iterations. When using something 1-based (e.g. JDBC, IIRC) I might be tempted to use <=. So:
for (int i=0; i < count; i++) // For 0-based APIs
for (int i=1; i <= count; i++) // For 1-based APIs
I would expect the performance difference to be insignificantly small in real-world code.
Problem
If you had to iterate through a loop 7 times, would you use: ``` for (int i = 0; i < 7; i++) ``` or: ``` for (int i = 0; i <= 6; i++) ``` There are two considerations: - performance - readability For performance I'm assuming Java or C#. Does it matter if "less than" or "less than or equal to" is used? If you have insight for a different language, please indicate which. For readability I'm assuming 0-based arrays. UPD: My mention of 0-based arrays may have confused things. I'm not talking about iterating through array elements. Just a general loop. There is a good point below about using a constant to which would explain what this magic number is. So if I had "`int NUMBER_OF_THINGS = 7`" then "`i <= NUMBER_OF_THINGS - 1`" would look weird, wouldn't it.