blocked in sending to unbounded LinkedBlockingQueue unless there is no receiver?
concurrency, deadlock, java, queue, static
Solution
It's blocked on the `synchronized(A.class)` not the queue.
When the main thread starts it loads class A. In order to do that it synchronizes on the class itself to effectively load the class. When you start a new thread and try to access the queue, it will try to load the class (since the class hasn't completed loading because of the busy spin in the second static block). Now that the first thread owns the synchronized lock the class, the second thread will sit on the class monitor until the first thread exists the second static (busy spin).
Run the program and `kill 3` it to see the thread-dump. You will notice the monitor is on the class and not the queue.
I will try to illustrate this.
Thread-1
Load Class A
synchronized(A.class){
static: create new Thread (call it Thread-2)
static: busy spin while (q.size() != amount);
}
Thread-2 (after first static)
run(){
A.q
Load Class A
synchronized(A.class){ //block until Thread-1 releases the lock
A.q.add(..);
}
}
Problem
I have a simple program to generate inputs to CRC32 which output a number ending with 123456 (in hex). It does bruteforce in a worker thread (the next step would be to make multiple worker threads). The worker thread sends results to the queue `q`. ``` import java.util.*; import java.util.concurrent.*; import java.util.zip.*; class A { static final BlockingQueue<List<Byte>> q = new LinkedBlockingQueue<List<Byte>>(); static { new Thread() { public void run() { System.out.println("worker thread starting"); int len = 1; byte[] a = new byte[32]; for (int i =0; i < 32; i++) a[i]=-128; while (true) { CRC32 crc = new CRC32(); crc.update(a, 0, len); long x = crc.getValue(); if ((x & 0xffffff) == 0x123456) { System.out.println("HA " + Arrays.toString(a) + "; " + x); List<Byte> l = new LinkedList<Byte>(); for (int i = 0; i < a.length; i++) l.add(a[i]); System.out.println("A"); q.add(l); System.out.println("B"); // never reaches here } // generate next guess boolean c = true; for (int i = 0; i < len && c; i++) { c = ++a[i] == -128; if (c) if (i + 2 > len) len = i + 2; } } } }.start(); } // for stats: amount of inputs found per interval static long amount = 3; static long interval; static { // record an initial value for interval, so any code using // it doesn't have to have a special case to check whether // it's initialized long start = System.currentTimeMillis(); while (q.size() != amount); interval = System.currentTimeMillis() - start; } public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("main"); } } ``` For some reason, it gets stuck: ``` $ javac A.java && java A worker thread starting HA [-49, 72, 73, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128, -128]; 1376924758 A ``` The worker thread is clearly blocked in sending to the queue (`q.add(l)`), otherwise, "B" would be printed to the console. If I comment out the line reading from the queue (`while (q.size() != amount)`), it no longer gets stuck. I thought this behavior is impossible for an unbounded queue (assuming there aren't already 2147483647 elements in it). This is not a `SynchronousQueue`, so sending to the queue should work regardless of whether any thread is receiving from it. In fact, this behavior seems opposite to `SynchronousQueue`: sending only works if there is no receiver. Why is the worker thread being blocked when it tries to send to the queue?