accessing global object when using requirejs

amd, javascript, requirejs

Solution

If you're not in strict mode, you can do this:

(function() {
  var global = this;

  define(function(){
    global.x = ...
    global.y = ...
  });
})();

The outer anonymous function that we immediately invoke is invoked with no particular special `this` value, and so (since this isn't in strict mode), receives the global object as `this`. (In strict mode, it would receive `undefined` instead.) So we grab `this` into a variable (`global`) within the anonymous function, and use it from the function you pass into `define` (which closes over it).

Problem

I know it's not recommended to use the global object and the whole idea behind using AMD is to avoid using the global object. But for some legacy code, I have to define some stuff in the global object. Currently the code looks like this: ``` //example2.js define(function(){ var globalObject = window; globalObject.x = ... globalObject.y = ... }); ``` It works but hard coding the global object `window` doesn't look very nice and I'm curious to see if it is possible to remove it. When `define()` was not used, the code looked like this: ``` //example1.js x = ... y = ... ``` I know, I know you hate this code, but let's be to the point: how can the global variable be accessed in a structured manner inside the `define()` function in requirejs? I wish there was something like a hidden last parameter to the function that is passed to the `define()` like this: ``` //example3.js define(function(globalObject){ globalObject.x = ... globalObject.y = ... }); ``` Or even simpler: the `this` variable would point to the global object inside that function. For example: ``` //example4.js define(function(){ this.x = ... this.y = ... }); ``` Note: I'm not sure about this last one. Investigating the `this` variable inside the function that is passed to `require()` says that it is equal to `window` which can be the answer to my question, but I haven't been able to find any documentation that mentions the context that the passed function is running. Maybe it is running in the context of the global variable after all?

Original source

Related problems