Why is greedy algorithm not finding maximum independent set of a graph?

algorithm, graph-theory

Solution

I'm not sure this is the simplest example, but here is one that fails: https://i.stack.imgur.com/ZPuHR.jpg

For the first step, you can choose B, C, D, or F since they all have degree 2. Suppose we remove B and its neighbors. That leaves F and D with degree 1 and E with degree 2. During the next two steps, we remove F and D and end up with a set size of 3, which is the maximum.

Instead suppose on the first step we removed C and its neighbors. This leaves us with F, A and E, each with a degree size of 2. We take either one of these next, and the graph is empty and our solution only contains 2 nodes, which as we have seen, isn't the maximum.

Problem

Given a graph G, why is following greedy algorithm not guaranteed to find maximum independent set of G: ``` Greedy(G): S = {} While G is not empty: Let v be a node with minimum degree in G S = union(S, {v}) remove v and its neighbors from G return S ``` I am wondering can someone show me a simple example of a graph where this algorithm fails?

Original source

Related problems