Haskell: surprising behavior of "groupBy"
combinators, haskell
Solution
Have a look at the ghc implementation of groupBy:
groupBy :: (a -> a -> Bool) -> [a] -> [[a]]
groupBy _ [] = []
groupBy eq (x:xs) = (x:ys) : groupBy eq zs
where (ys,zs) = span (eq x) xs
Now compare these two outputs:
Prelude List> groupBy (<) [1, 2, 3, 2, 4, 1, 5, 9]
[[1,2,3,2,4],[1,5,9]]
Prelude List> groupBy (<) [8, 2, 3, 2, 4, 1, 5, 9]
[[8],[2,3],[2,4],[1,5,9]]
In short, what happens is this: `groupBy` assumes that the given function (the first argument) tests for equality, and thus assumes that the comparison function is reflexive, transitive and symmetric (see equivalence relation). The problem here is that the less-than relation is not reflexive, nor symmetric.
Edit: The following implementation only assumes transitivity:
groupBy' :: (a -> a -> Bool) -> [a] -> [[a]]
groupBy' _ [] = []
groupBy' _ [x] = [[x]]
groupBy' cmp (x:xs@(x':_)) | cmp x x' = (x:y):ys
| otherwise = [x]:r
where r@(y:ys) = groupBy' cmp xs
Problem
I'm trying to figure out the behavior of the library function groupBy (from Data.List), which purports to group elements of a list by an "equality test" function passed in as the first argument. The type signature suggests that the equality test just needs to have type ``` (a -> a -> Bool) ``` However, when I use (<) as the "equality test" in GHCi 6.6, the results are not what I expect: ``` ghci> groupBy (<) [1, 2, 3, 2, 4, 1, 5, 9] [[1,2,3,2,4],[1,5,9]] ``` Instead I'd expect runs of strictly increasing numbers, like this: ``` [[1,2,3],[2,4],[1,5,9]] ``` What am I missing?