Associative container with predictable keys: which one to use?
c++, stl
Solution
If you do use an `stl::map` -- even if just for profiling to compare with a hash -- you can use your knowledge that "items are inserted with ascending key values" to greatly increase the efficiency of the `stl::map` insertion operation by giving a hint to the insert call:
iterator insert ( iterator position_hint, const value_type& x );
... where the `position_hint` will be, for example, an iterator to the previous item inserted.
Problem
A simple question, but the answer is not obvious to me: For performance reasons, which map-type (or maybe non map-type?) container should I, from a performance perspective, best use in the following scenario: - keys are unsigned integer numbers, - insertions are frequent, - read access is even more frequent and random access, - items are inserted with ascending key values (first inserted item has key 0, next one key 1 and so on), - items are removed randomly (so sooner or later the list of keys will have "holes", as the corresponding items have been deleted). Removal is almost as frequent as insertion. I hesitate to use `std::map`, as ascending key order and frequent removal seem to imply continuous re-balancing of the search tree, which to me seems to be a waste of performance. In other words: Can I gain performance from the fact that I know in advance what the keys of the items will be and even the order in which the keys will appear for insertion? (I do not know the total number of items, though.)