Creating a cross-computer mutex using SQL Server
locking, sql-server, sql-server-2008, synchronization
Solution
I have put together a little class will test and feedback
public class GlobalMutex
{
private SqlCommand _sqlCommand;
private SqlConnection _sqlConnection;
string sqlCommandText = @"
declare @result int
exec @result =sp_getapplock @Resource=@ResourceName, @LockMode='Exclusive', @LockOwner='Transaction', @LockTimeout = @LockTimeout
";
public GlobalMutex(SqlConnection sqlConnection, string unqiueName, TimeSpan lockTimeout)
{
_sqlConnection = sqlConnection;
_sqlCommand = new SqlCommand(sqlCommandText, sqlConnection);
_sqlCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@ResourceName", unqiueName);
_sqlCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@LockTimeout", lockTimeout.TotalMilliseconds);
}
private readonly object _lockObject = new object();
private Locker _lock = null;
public Locker Lock
{
get
{
lock(_lockObject)
{
if (_lock != null)
{
throw new InvalidOperationException("Unable to call Lock twice"); // dont know why
}
_lock = new Locker(_sqlConnection, _sqlCommand);
}
return _lock;
}
}
public class Locker : IDisposable
{
private SqlTransaction _sqlTransaction;
private SqlCommand _sqlCommand;
internal Locker(SqlConnection sqlConnection, SqlCommand sqlCommand)
{
_sqlCommand = sqlCommand;
_sqlTransaction = sqlConnection.BeginTransaction();
_sqlCommand.Transaction = _sqlTransaction;
int result = sqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery();
}
public void Dispose()
{
Dispose(true);
GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
}
protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
if (disposing)
{
_sqlTransaction.Commit(); // maybe _sqlTransaction.Rollback() might be slower
}
}
}
}
Usage is:
GlobalMutex globalMutex = new GlobalMutex(
new SqlConnection(""),
"myGlobalUniqueLockName",
new TimeSpan(0, 1, 0)
);
using (globalMutex.Lock)
{
// do work.
}
Problem
I have a few computers using the same database (SQL Server 2008) I'm trying to synchronize a task between all these computers using the database. Each task is represented by a guid that is the lock-id (if comparing to Mutex, that would be the Mutex name) I have a few thoughts, but I think they are kind of hacks, and was hoping someone here would have a better solution: - Create a new table "Locks" each row consists of a guid, lock the table row exclusively in a transaction - and complete/revert the transaction when finished. - use the `sp_getapplock` in a transaction where the lock name is the lock-id guid I think that holding a transaction running is not so good... I thought maybe there's a solution that does not require me to hold an open transaction or session?