difference between @Component and @Configuration in Spring 3

java, spring, spring-3

Solution

`@Configuration` is the heart of the Java-based configuration mechanism that was introduced in Spring 3. It provides an alternative to XML-based configuration.

So the 2 following snippets are identical:

<beans ...>
    <context:component-scan base-package="my.base.package"/>
    ... other configuration ...
</beans>

and:

@Configuration
@ComponentScan(basePackages = "my.base.package")
public class RootConfig {
    ... other configuration ...
}

In both cases Spring will scan in `my.base.package` and below for classes annotated with `@Component` or one of the other annotations that are meta-annotated with `@Component` such as `@Service`.

Problem

I came across two annotations provided by Spring 3 (@Component and @Configuration) I am a bit confused between these. Here is what I read about `@Component` Put this “context:component” in the bean configuration file, it means, enable the auto-scanning feature in Spring. The base-package is indicate where are your components stored, Spring will scan this folder and find out the bean (annotated with @Component) and register it in Spring container. So I am wondering what is the use of `@Configuration` then if `@Controller` will register my beans without the need to declare them in the spring configuration XML file.

Original source