Can C# 4.0 variance help me call a base class constructor with an upcast?
c#, generic-variance
Solution
No, because while `C` inherits from `B`, `A<C>` does not inherit from `A<B>`.
To understand why this is the case, imagine if `A<T>` were instead `List<T>`:
class B { }
class C : B { }
class D : B { }
class My1 {
public My1(List<B> lessDerivedTemplateParameter)
{
// This is totally legal
lessDerivedTemplateParameter.Add(new D());
}
}
class My2 : My1 {
public My2(List<C> moreDerivedTemplateParameter)
// if this were allowed, then My1 could add a D to a list of Bs
: base(moreDerivedTemplateParameter)
{
}
}
Now on the other hand, this is legal:
interface IA<out T> {
public T GetSome();
}
class B { }
class C : B { }
class D : B { }
class My1 {
public My1(IA<B> lessDerivedTemplateParameter)
{
// This is totally legal
var someB = lessDerivedTemplateParameter.GetSome();
}
}
class My2 : My1 {
public My2(IA<C> moreDerivedTemplateParameter)
// This is allowed, because an A<C> only *produces* C's (which are also B's)
// so the base class (which consumes B's, and doesnt care if they are C's)
// can use an IA<C>
: base(moreDerivedTemplateParameter)
{
}
}
Problem
I was reading a bit on generic variance and I don't have a full understanding of it yet but I'd like to know if it makes something like the following possible? ``` class A<T> { } class B { } class C : B { } class My1 { public My1(A<B> lessDerivedTemplateParameter) { } } class My2 : My1 { public My2(A<C> moreDerivedTemplateParameter) : base(moreDerivedTemplateParameter) // <-- compile error here, cannot convert { } } ```