What are good use-cases for tuples in C++11?
c++, c++11, tuples
Solution
Well, imho, the most important part is generic code. Writing generic code that works on all kinds of structs is a lot harder than writing generics that work on tuples. For example, the `std::tie` function you mentioned yourself would be very nearly impossible to make for structs.
this allows you to do things like this:
- Store function parameters for delayed execution (e.g. this question )
- Return multiple parameters without cumbersome (un)packing with `std::tie`
- Combine (not equal-typed) data sets (e.g. from parallel execution), it can be done as simply as `std::tuple_cat`.
The thing is, it does not stop with these uses, people can expand on this list and write generic functionality based on tuples that is much harder to do with structs. Who knows, maybe tomorrow someone finds a brilliant use for serialization purposes.
Problem
What are good use-cases for using tuples in C++11? For example, I have a function that defines a local struct as follows: ``` template<typename T, typename CmpF, typename LessF> void mwquicksort(T *pT, int nitem, const int M, CmpF cmp, LessF less) { struct SI { int l, r, w; SI() {} SI(int _l, int _r, int _w) : l(_l), r(_r), w(_w) {} } stack[40]; // etc ``` I was considering to replace the `SI` struct with an `std::tuple<int,int,int>`, which is a far shorter declaration with convenient constructors and operators already predefined, but with the following disadvantages: - Tuple elements are hidden in obscure, implementation-defined structs. Even though Visual studio interprets and shows their contents nicely, I still can't put conditional breakpoints that depend on value of tuple elements. - Accessing individual tuple fields (`get<0>(some_tuple)`) is far more verbose than accessing struct elements (`s.l`). - Accessing fields by name is far more informative (and shorter!) than by numeric index. The last two points are somewhat addressed by the `tie` function. Given these disadvantages, what would be a good use-case for tuples? UPDATE Turns out that VS2010 SP1 debugger cannot show the contents of the following array `std::tuple<int, int, int> stack[40]`, but it works fine when it's coded with a struct. So the decision is basically a no-brainer: if you'll ever have to inspect its values, use a struct [esp. important with debuggers like GDB].