Python optimisations in this code?
optimization, python
Solution
When you are trying to optimise, the thing you have to do is profile and measure! Python provides the `timeit` module which makes measuring things easy!
This will assume that you've converted fields to a list of floats beforehand (outside any of these functions), since the string → float conversion is very slow. You can do this via `fields = [float(f) for f in string_fields]`.
Also, for doing numerical processing, pure python isn't very good, since it ends up doing a lot of type-checking (and some other stuff) for each operation. Using a C library like numpy will give massive improvements.
find_best
I have incorporated the answers of others (and a few more) into a profiling suite (say, `test_find_best.py`):
import random, operator, numpy as np, itertools, timeit
fields = [random.random() for _ in range(3000)]
fields_string = [str(field) for field in fields]
weights = [[random.random() for _ in range(3000)] for c in range(100)]
npw = np.array(weights)
npf = np.array(fields)
num_fields = len(fields)
num_category = len(weights)
def f_original():
winner = -1
best = -float('inf')
for c in range(num_category):
score = 0
for i in range(num_fields):
score += float(fields_string[i]) * weights[c][i]
if score > best:
best = score
winner = c
def f_original_no_string():
winner = -1
best = -float('inf')
for c in range(num_category):
score = 0
for i in range(num_fields):
score += fields[i] * weights[c][i]
if score > best:
best = score
winner = c
def f_original_xrange():
winner = -1
best = -float('inf')
for c in xrange(num_category):
score = 0
for i in xrange(num_fields):
score += fields[i] * weights[c][i]
if score > best:
best = score
winner = c
# Zenon http://stackoverflow.com/a/10134298/1256624
def f_index_comprehension():
winner = -1
best = -float('inf')
for c in range(num_category):
score = sum(fields[i] * weights[c][i] for i in xrange(num_fields))
if score > best:
best = score
winner = c
# steveha http://stackoverflow.com/a/10134247/1256624
def f_comprehension():
winner = -1
best = -float('inf')
for c in xrange(num_category):
score = sum(f * w for f, w in itertools.izip(fields, weights[c]))
if score > best:
best = score
winner = c
def f_schwartz_original(): # https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwartzian_transform
tup = max(((i, sum(t[0] * t[1] for t in itertools.izip(fields, wlist))) for i, wlist in enumerate(weights)),
key=lambda t: t[1]
)
def f_schwartz_opt(): # https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwartzian_transform
tup = max(((i, sum(f * w for f,w in itertools.izip(fields, wlist))) for i, wlist in enumerate(weights)),
key=operator.itemgetter(1)
)
def fweight(field_float_list, wlist):
f = iter(field_float_list)
return sum(f.next() * w for w in wlist)
def f_schwartz_iterate():
tup = max(
((i, fweight(fields, wlist)) for i, wlist in enumerate(weights)),
key=lambda t: t[1]
)
# Nolen Royalty http://stackoverflow.com/a/10134147/1256624
def f_numpy_mult_sum():
np.argmax(np.sum(npf * npw, axis = 1))
# me
def f_imap():
winner = -1
best = -float('inf')
for c in xrange(num_category):
score = sum(itertools.imap(operator.mul, fields, weights[c]))
if score > best:
best = score
winner = c
def f_numpy():
np.argmax(npw.dot(npf))
for f in [f_original,
f_index_comprehension,
f_schwartz_iterate,
f_original_no_string,
f_schwartz_original,
f_original_xrange,
f_schwartz_opt,
f_comprehension,
f_imap]:
print "%s: %.2f ms" % (f.__name__, timeit.timeit(f,number=10)/10 * 1000)
for f in [f_numpy_mult_sum, f_numpy]:
print "%s: %.2f ms" % (f.__name__, timeit.timeit(f,number=100)/100 * 1000)
Running `python test_find_best.py` gives me:
f_original: 310.34 ms
f_index_comprehension: 102.58 ms
f_schwartz_iterate: 103.39 ms
f_original_no_string: 96.36 ms
f_schwartz_original: 90.52 ms
f_original_xrange: 89.31 ms
f_schwartz_opt: 69.48 ms
f_comprehension: 68.87 ms
f_imap: 53.33 ms
f_numpy_mult_sum: 3.57 ms
f_numpy: 0.62 ms
So the numpy version using `.dot` (sorry, I can't find the documentation for it atm) is the fastest. If you are doing a lot of numerical operations (which it seems you are), it might be worth converting `fields` and `weights` as numpy arrays as soon as you create them.
update_weights
Numpy is likely to offer a similar speed-up for `update_weights`, doing something like:
def update_weights(weights, fields, to_increase, to_decrease):
weights[to_increase,:] += fields
weights[to_decrease,:] -= fields
return weights
(I haven't tested or profiled that btw, you need to do that.)
Problem
I have two fairly simple code snippets and I'm running both of them a very large amount of times; I'm trying to determine if there's any optimisation I can do to speed up the execution time. If there's anything that stands out as something that could be done a lot quicker... In the first one, we've got a list, fields. We've also got a list of lists, weights. We're trying to find which weight list multiplied by fields will produce the maximum sum. Fields is about 30k entries long. ``` def find_best(weights,fields): winner = -1 best = -float('inf') for c in range(num_category): score = 0 for i in range(num_fields): score += float(fields[i]) * weights[c][i] if score > best: best = score winner = c return winner ``` In the second one, we're trying to update two of our weight lists; one gets increased and one decreased. The amount to increase/decrease each element in the is equal to the corresponding element in fields (e.g. if fields[4] = 10.5, then we want to increase weights[toincrease][4] by 10.5 and decrease weights[todecrease][4] by 10.5) ``` def update_weights(weights,fields,toincrease,todecrease): for i in range(num_fields): update = float(fields[i]) weights[toincrease][i] += update weights[todecrease][i] -= update return weights ``` I hope this isn't an overly specific question.